My Blog List

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

Viral Marketing, Word-of-Mouth and The AISAS Model

                                                 Chapter 1

                                               Introduction

Viral marketing or also known as buzz marketing or word-of-mouth marketing is one of the most marketing communications tools many companies applied because of its effectiveness and efficiency. Hermawan Kartajaya from Mark Plus Institute named it a ‘Low Budget High Impact’ marketing communications tool. This Paper will explain why word of mouth is perceived as efficient and effective. And how should We relate the AISAS model of Sugiyama & Andree (2011) with word of mouth?


Chapter 2

Viral Marketing and Word of Mouth Marketing

The concept of viral marketing has been discussed in the literature for over 15 years, since Jeffrey Rayport first introduced the term in 1996 (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2011). According to (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2011) in their Article, viral marketing is a relatively recent phenomenon and has been discussed in the literature under a variety of different terminologies such as word-of-mouth (Goldenberg, Libai, & Muller, 2001), Buzz Marketing (Thomas, 2004), stealth marketing (Kaikati & Kaikati, 2004) and word-of-mouth marketing (Kozinets, de Valck, Wojnicki, & Wilner, 2010).

Viral marketing also defined as electronic word-of-mouth whereby some form of marketing message related to a company, brand, or product is transmitted in an exponentially growing way–often through the use of social media applications (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2011). Viral Marketing is any kind of marketing strategy to make a marketing message grows exponentially through individual (target audience) support or individual influence on others and the mechanism of disseminating information through word-of-mouth in the social network. The dissemination of information carried out by individuals can be voluntary and information duplicated by everyone. Duplication of information between these individuals then drives widespread and massive information messages by analogy to the spread of viruses that tend to be rapid and uncontrollable. Viral marketing takes advantage of networks of influence among customers to inexpensively achieve large changes in behavior (Richardson & Domingos, 2002)

In many kinds of literature, the terminology of viral marketing, word-of-mouth, and buzz marketing replace each other. However, viral marketing is a step further than word-of-mouth. I can say it is as empowered as word-of-mouth with the use of a communication network. In the new era of media, social media applications pushed word-of-mouth into Viral Marketing. This relationship is described by (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2011) in the below figure:

Picture 2.1


Picture: The Relationship between Word-of-mouth and Viral Marketing

Source: (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2011)

For simplification of the discussion then I would assume the terminology of the two can replace each other. I'm going to use the term word-of-mouth marketing for further discussion in this paper. The use of word of mouth itself is the nature of viral marketing. How viral marketing works is with a word-of-mouth medium. And social communication network is as leverage that makes it a viral force.

Chapter 3

Word-of-Mouth: Definition, Characteristic

Word-of-mouth is defined as oral, person-to-person communication between a receiver and a communicator whom the receiver perceives as non-commercial, regarding a brand, product, or service (Arndt, 1967). WOM involves the exchange of ephemeral oral or spoken messages between a contiguous source and a recipient who communicate directly in real life (Stern, 1994)

(Poeradisastra, 2021) stated that according to (Dicther, 2011) People have four reasons to do word-of-mouth:

 

  1. Product involvement (33%). The product is good.
  2. Self-involvement (24%). Sharing knowledge and opinion to get attention.
  3. Other-involvement (20%). People love to express fraternity, attention, and friendship.
  4. Message involvement (20%). People love to share and get various information

To encourage individuals spread the message some criteria will encourage the effective word-of-mouth process.

Picture 3.1


Picture: The Role of Word-of-Mouth

Source: (Poeradisastra, 2021)

Chapter 4

Word-of-Mouth: An Effective and Efficient Communication tools in Integrated Marketing Communication Perspective


In the Integrated marketing communication perspective, word-of-mouth is one of the IMC audience contact tools (where the marketer/product can contact to the target audience). 

Picture 4.1

Picture: IMC Audience Contacts

Source: (Belch & Belch, 2018)

(Belch & Belch, 2018) stated that According to Tom Duncan there are four basic categories of contact or touchpoints:

1. Company-created touch points are planned marketing communication messages created by the company such as advertisements, websites and social media sites, news/press releases, packaging, brochures and collateral material, sale promotions, and point-of-purchase displays along with other types of in-store décor. Company-created touch points account for a large part of an IMC program and have the advantage of being under the control of the marketer

2.  Intrinsic touch points are interactions that occur with a company or brand during the process of buying or using the product or service such as discussions with retail sales personnel or customer service representatives.

3.  Unexpected touch points are unanticipated references or information about a company or brand that a customer or prospect receives that is beyond the control of the organization. Probably the most influential type of unexpected contact is a word-of-mouth message which refers to personal communication that comes from friends, associates, neighbors, co-workers, or family members. Unexpected messages may also come from other sources such as the media which may print or broadcast stories about a company and/or its brands, as well as experts who write about products and services. Another type of unexpected touch point that has become very influential is websites that provide reviews of products and services. Some of these sites provide expert reviews while others give reviews from other customers

4. Customer-initiated touch points are interactions that occur whenever a customer or prospect contacts a company. Most of these contacts involve inquiries or complaints consumers might have regarding the use of a product or service and occur through calls made directly to the company, via e-mails, or through specific sections of websites to which customers are directed.

Word-of-Mouth is perceived as the most effective marketing communication

Every touch point has its own characteristic and not all touch point are equally effective (give the same level of impact to the target audience) also not all touch point is equal in regard to a company’s ability to control or influence them. Unexpected touch points can give the highest impact on the target audience but on the other hand, it is most difficult to control by the company or marketer. Control is entirely in the market not on the part of the marketer or the company.

Picture 4.2

Word-of-Mouth is an unexpected touch point. Therefore, the impact is higher than other touch points. Research generally supports the claim that WOM is more influential on behavior than other marketer-controlled sources (Buttle, 1998). According to Sheth (1971), WOM was more important than advertising in raising awareness of innovation and in securing the decision to try the product. WOM has been shown to influence a variety of conditions: awareness, expectations, perceptions, attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior (Buttle, 1998)

Word-of-mouth marketing messages can better convince individuals to take a stand against the product. The factor that strengthens the influence of WOM is perceived credibility from influencers.  Perceived credibility itself is helped by 3 factors, namely authority & Trustee, Profiles, and Social validation (Jessen & Jorgensen, 2011). Meanwhile, Fogg and Tseng argue that from the dozen or more elements that contribute to credibility evaluation, there are just two key dimensions of credibility: trustworthiness and expertise (Fogg, 2003). Each model is described below:

Picture 4.3

Picture and source: Perceived Credibility by (Fogg, 2003) and  (Jessen & Jorgensen, 2011)

In addition, individuals tend to gain social influence from the environment in making decisions. Word-of-mouth effectively influences individual so they have a certain attitude towards the product. We can understand it by understanding how the word of mouth is worked. The model of WOM is developed by (Buttle, 1998). According to (Buttle, 1998) there are two variables as described in the model below: 

Intrapersonal variables: these are states or processes which are associated either with seeking input WOM or precipitating output WOM.

Extra personal variables: these are contextual conditions which influence the seeking of input WOM or the production of output WOM.

Picture 4.4


Picture: Word-of-mouth Model

Source: (Buttle, 1998)

Word-of-Mouth perceived as an efficient communication tools

The various types of customer touch points also can be categorized as Paid, Owned, and Earned. According to (Belch & Belch, 2018) :

· Paid media, refers to channels a marketer pays to leverage and includes traditional advertising media such as television, radio, print, outdoor, and direct mail as well as various forms of digital advertising such as paid search and online display and video ads.

·  Owned media refers to channels of marketing communication that a company controls, such as its websites, blogs, and mobile apps as well as social media channels such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube.

·  Earned media, is exposure for a company or brand that it did not have to pay for and is generated by outside entities such as the media or the public. Earned media has traditionally been viewed as exposure for a company or brand generated by its public relations/ publicity efforts or through favorable word of mouth. However, with the growth of digital and social media, earned media exposure is taking place online through social media and as a result of the viral marketing efforts of marketers which focus on getting consumers, as well as the media, to share information about their company and/or brands. This can occur through tweets and re-tweets on Twitter, social media posts on Facebook or Instagram, product reviews, blogs, video sharing, and discussions within online communities

Company use these three-customer touch point combination in integrated marketing communication. The kind of media is in each customer touch points then can be categorized on the below figure: 

Picture 4.5

Picture: Customer touch points Paid, Owned and Earned

Source: (Belch & Belch, 2018)

Word of Mouth is the one of the earned customer touch points. The customers or media become the independent channel. That’s why in term of control this channel is the most difficult to control but in give the highest impact. This is the free cost channel because “market worked” voluntarily to spread our marketing message based on any kind of drive or motives. (see previous chapter the driver of WOM)

Chapter 5

Word-of-Mouth and AISAS Model

The AISAS is one of the models which describe the Consumer Decision Making or Consumer Behavior model that explain how the processes when individuals or groups select, purchase, use, or dispose of products, service, ideas, or experiences to satisfy needs and desires (Solomon, 2018) or the process that consumers display in searching for, purchasing, using, evaluating, and disposing of products and services that they expect will satisfy their needs. (Schiffman, 2010). According to AISAS Model, the consumer decision-making process or consumer behavior describe in the non-linear process, Attention-Interest-Search-Action-Share.

Consumer behavior depicted in this model has the role of conveying information or sharing the message of their attitude toward the product to others. The process of sharing information can even occur at the emotional stage when individuals are emotionally involved. (interest-search-Action). In this stage when individuals are emotionally engaged (as described in the model in the emotion stage) in a product whether it is positive or negative, they will tend to convey their experience to others, and it can influence others in acting toward the product. This is where the dissemination of information through word-of-mouth happened that will give an impact on the product far exceeds the impact obtained from other customer touch points.


Picture 5.1

Picture: AISAS Model

Source: (Sugiyama & Andree, 2010)

The behavioral patterns depicted in the AISAS model are particularly relevant to current conditions when the new media era has replaced the nature of the conventional media era which tends to be slow, limited, and one-way. In the age of digital media, everyone can be a source of news even from consumption behaviors that can have an influence on their environment through the spread of information that is increasingly widespread, fast, and unlimited. In particular, the exponential growth factor lies in the power of digitized social networks such as social media.

Companies and marketers urgently need to understand consumer behavior patterns as described in the AISAS model so as to determine the right marketing communication strategy at each stage of the consumer behavior process that is passed in addition answering what is the needs of consumers in each stage can also encourage consumers to do word-of-mouth (share) that is positive for brands.

Chapter 6

Word of Mouth: A case study in Indonesia

In this chapter, I want to give some examples of word-of-mouth case studies in Indonesia.

1.   April Mop-Go Date by Gojek.

In 2016 Gojek created the Go Date application that invited considerable public reaction because the application offered is quite creative, unique and can be categorized as controversial especially if it is associated with social ethics.


                                                            Picture 6.1


Picture: GoDate by Gojek- April Mop

Source: YouTube

Of course, this service is not really in the Gojek app. This is part of Gojek's strategy of capitalizing on April fools' day momentum. Godate's campaign was communicated through various social media channels. The campaign went viral in 2016.

 

2.   Product Review in Social Media: YouTube (Gadget Review, Beauty Vlogger)

High penetration in internet usage in Indonesia and high penetration of social media usage among the internet user encourage user-generated content which is focused on product reviews (in many categories). The user-generated content acts as the influencer for society (at least for their follower or their content viewer)

Picture 6.2


Picture: Beauty Vlogger-Product Review for Beauty Product and Gadget Product Review

Source: YouTube


3.   Endorsement via Instagram (endorse Marketing)

Word-of-mouth also can be delivered through endorse marketing. This strategy involves celebrities making conversation about the product, Celebrities act as influencers who share their experience with the product with their follower or viewer. The example below is Buavita product and Hydro Coco which is endorsed by Sigi Wimala and Deny Sumargo.

Picture 6.3

Picture: Endorse Marketing (Buavita and Hydro Coco)

Source: Instagram

Chapter 7

Concussion


Word-of-mouth is one of the customer touches points (unexpected touch point and earned customer touch point) that has a high impact and on the other hand is most difficult to control by the marketer or company because it is fully controlled by customers and media channels. WOM effectiveness and high efficiency on the other hand have the greatest risk because the ability of marketers and companies to control this is very low. It can be contra productive if word of mouth occurs in negative marketing messages (as the consequence that consumers tend to share their experiences with others—as described in the AISAS model). Companies or marketers rely heavily on word-of-mouth effective marketing. For that marketers need to understand the things that drive the occurrence of word of mouth and apply it in their communication strategy (be interesting, make people happy, earn trust and respect and make it easy for everyone to spread our marketing message).


References

Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-related Conversation in the Diffusion of a New Product. Journal of Marketing Research 4,, 291-295.

Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. A. (2018). Advertising and Promotion. An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. 11 ed. . New York: McGraw Hill Education.

Buttle, F. A. (1998). Word of Mouth: Understanding and Managing Referral Marketing. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING 6, 241-254.

Dicther, E. (2011). Word of Mouth Marketing. Harvard Business Review.

Fogg, B. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.

Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., & Muller, E. (2001). Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letter 12(3), 211-223.

Jessen, J., & Jorgensen, A. H. (2011). Aggregated trustworthiness: Redefining online credibility through social validation. First Monday, Peer-reviewed journal on the internet, 1.

Kaikati, A., & Kaikati, J. (2004). Stealth Marketing: How to Reach Consumers Surreptitiously. California Management Review, 46(4), 6-22.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2011). Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing. Elsevier, 253-263.

Kozinets, R., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A., & Wilner, S. (2010). Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71-89.

Poeradisastra, T. (2021). Internet Marketing, Viral and WOM. Jakarta, Indonesia.

Richardson, M., & Domingos, P. (2002). Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. KDD02: The Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 61-70). Edmonton Alberta Canada: Association for Computing MachineryNew YorkNYUnited States.

Rieh, S., & Hilligoss, B. (2008). "College students" credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. In Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility (pp. 19-72). Digital Media,.

Schiffman, L. G. (2010). Consumer behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Solomon, R. M. (2018). Consumer Behavior. Buying, Having, Being. Pearson Education Limited 2018.

Stern, B. (1994). A Revised Model for Advertising: Multiple Dimensions of the Source, the Message, and the Recipient. Journal of Advertising 23(2),, 5-16.

Sugiyama, K., & Andree, T. (2010). The Dentsu Way: Secrets of Cross Switch Marketing from the World’s Most Innovative Advertising Agency. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.

Thomas, G. (2004). Building the Buzz in the Hive Mind. Journal of Consumer Behavior,4(1), 64-72.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Consumer Decision-Making Process (Case: high involvement purchases)

Chapter 1 Introduction In this paper we will discuss about the consumer decision-making process especially for high involvement purchases   ...